Hostility Index Survey

Assessment Overview

Hostility Index

Threat Surface Index intake

This produces two readings for your Threat Surface Index. Exposure is what makes you worth targeting. Pressure is what has already reached you. They call for different work, and your answers determine which comes first.

⏱ 5 to 10 minutes

Before you start

  • Don't minimize. The most common failure here. People downplay harassment because it stopped or seemed minor in hindsight. Under-reporting routes you to lighter protection than you need. Between two options, take the higher one.
  • Answer “what you are” questions as of today. Answer “what has happened” questions across your whole history, including matters you consider closed.
  • Best estimate is fine. Don't research your answers.
  • Select an affiliation only if it would surface in a search for your name. Leadership, board, ownership, or spokesperson roles count. Ordinary membership doesn't.
  • Answer for yourself only. Covered family members complete their own assessment and we link the records.

How this is handled

Nothing is scanned here. Your analyst runs the technical exposure work separately and reconciles the two at review.

Section 1 of 16

Professional Visibility

Select the option that best describes your professional visibility

Section 2 of 16

Financial & Social Presence

Section 3 of 16

Public Records & Family

Leave all unchecked if none apply

Section 4 of 16

Findability & Reachability

How easily someone outside your household could locate you

Section 5 of 16

Public Positions

Section 6 of 16

Unwanted Attention

What has already reached you

Section 7 of 16

Harassment & Doxxing History

Section 8 of 16

Network Targeting & Identity

Section 9 of 16

Grievance Holders & Trajectory

Note: the cyclical option scores differently from "stayed level" — it reflects recurrence risk, not current intensity

Section 10 of 16

Targeting Specificity

This determines whether incidents indicate a personal fixation or general-population exposure

This answer gates how much realized-incident evidence is attributed to a fixated individual vs. a broader adversary group

Section 11 of 16

Heat Tags — Brands & Affiliations

Tags now route to adversary groups — not a flat score

Select multiple by clicking each. Breadth across adversary groups amplifies the score.

Section 12 of 16

Heat Tags — Political & Ideological

Select multiple by clicking each

Section 13 of 16

Heat Tags — Professional Roles

Select multiple by clicking each

Section 14 of 16

Heat Tags — Digital & Technology

Select multiple by clicking each

Section 15 of 16

Heat Tags — Identity & Science/Health

Section 16 of 16

Additional Context (Optional)

This helps calibrate the adversary attribution in your report

Date: - Hostility Index v3 · Two-axis model
Exposure
What makes you worth targeting
Pressure
⚠️ Post-incident floor active
What is already happening
Hostility Index
Composite score for TSI
Position

Adversary Profile

Which adversary groups are active in your profile, and how hot each one is. Solid bar = structural profile. Shaded extension = added by realized-incident evidence.

From profile Added by incident evidence

Salience & Findability

Two distinct exposures. Salience governs who notices you — it amplifies every adversary. Findability governs who can reach you — it amplifies only actors that require a destination (fixated, militant, criminal, foreign).

Salience — How Known
Findability — How Locatable

Advanced Analysis

For a comprehensive remediation plan including your full adversary profile narrative and sequenced action items, contact ObscureIQ.